Perry Mason Season 2 Episode 2 Ending Explained: At the start of the second season of HBO the show “Perry Mason,” the titular character decides that he’s no longer interested in practicing criminal law. In the first season, he manages to save Emily Dodson, but as a whole, he fails.
Mason wanted to avoid making the same mistake again. He does not want to be responsible for other people’s lives. He is content to tackle civil matters as they’re simpler than criminal matters but can still be mean at times.
Mason is drawn into the mystery of the Brooks McCutcheon murders despite the undeniable fact that he does not want to be involved in it and has good reasons to be.
At the end of the episode, he’s at the center of the city’s coming media storm, whose shaky foundations will be tested as the case develops. What follows is an evidence of what the ending means for Mason and his client.
Perry Mason Season 2 Episode 2 Recap

The Gallardo brothers, Rafael and Matteo, have been arrested for the Brooks McCutcheon murder. The police claim that there’s solid evidence against them.
District attorneys believe the Gallardo brothers will receive life sentences. Their assigned lawyer also seemed to have accepted the situation and did not even bother to contact their families.
Upon learning of the Emily Dodson case, the Gallardos visit Mason’s office for help.
They begged Mason to move on with the case, but he refused. However, after talking to Strickland, he started having second thoughts.
He becomes so fixated on one detail that he’s forced into the parking area where the victim’s abandoned car is kept. Mason accepted the case after believing that the Gallardo brothers couldn’t have killed Brooks.
He does not realize that a number of things are working against him. Potential witnesses who might be capable to solve the mystery are killed while false evidence is placed.
Mason takes a dangerous route with the help of Della and Drake to uncover the facts surrounding Brooks McCutcheon’s death.
Perry Mason Season 2 Episode 2 Ending Explained

We were introduced to the world of Brooks McCutcheon in the previous episode “Perry Mason”. In this episode, Perry Mason decides whether to take Gallardo’s case and how to approach it.
However, different circumstances in several areas of the city threaten to weaken its defenses totally.
We saw a man named Charlie Goldstein receive a subpoena from the court in one scenario. It is not known why he got it or how it relates to the Brooks McCutcheon murder.
Later, when Mason and Della start investigating the victim, they learn some unforeseen facts. Della finds a money trail that shows Brooks engaged in unethical behavior. This particularly relates to Morocco, a ship with a lot of overdue bills.
To learn more about what happened to the boats, Mason and Drake stop by one of McCutcheon’s ships. Holcomb and Perry met one another there. He is not surprised to learn that cases of shady business practices are again at the center of attention of dishonest police.
But that’s not the big discovery of this episode. Drake spoke to the crew in the kitchen and learned that the financial situation may be worse than they thought.
Also, we learn that Charlie Goldstein is the source of the ship’s earnings. Charlie is brutally murdered in the next scene, and Mr. Crippen, another wealthy man with ties to McCutcheon, is informed of the crime.
He burned a piece of paper confirming that Brooks McCutcheon had received a subpoena, as did Goldstein, after being pleased with the news.
As a result of the events that transpired in this episode, it became clear that an especially powerful individual was responsible, and this individual didn’t hesitate to frame two innocent people to blame for the murders they committed.
An unidentified individual plant is something Drake identifies as Santa Monica’s phone number in one scenario.
It’s safe to presume that the man worked in law enforcement, given that he committed the act in front of the person in command of safeguarding evidence.
Since Holcomb was also involved in burning a ship full of individuals in the pilot, it seems likely that he was the culprit. But he also has the potential to be a distraction.